Trickier Rule Clarifications

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby bennymacca » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:34 pm

whats the consensus?

read first page, and people are all agreeing that betting is not reopened if someone doesn't make a legal raise, but are disagreeing on what a legal raise is.

cbf reading whole thing
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby AceLosesKing » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:36 pm

Scott wrote:The 50% rule applies to limit poker.


"He's all in for the minimum + 50! Yes, I can reraise another 100!"
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

User avatar
Scotty
Site Admin
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: IpumpFishies
Location: The 37th state
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby Scotty » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:40 pm

The grey area always stems from what constitutes a 'legal' raise.

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby bennymacca » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:42 pm

i would really like to know the anwser

i always thought it was a full BB, but now that people mention 50%, i am not sure
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
BigPete33
Moderator
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:08 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: FarmAnimal
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby BigPete33 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:42 pm

Dave I thought the 50% thing was more for stuff like if a player has put chips out not realising it had already been raised, but the chips they put out are already at 50% the raise amount from the previous player, therefore they are obliged to complete the call - or something.

I might also be getting that mixed up with something else but from memory it's also one of those "it depends where you're playing and what the house rules are" scenarios.
Pardon me, but I think you'll find that's a shovel. See you next Tuesday!

User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 8964
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:10 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Locker101
Location: The Scumm Bar
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby David » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:46 pm

Different rule Pete. Not saying that's wrong though.




If a player has called, they can't then raise unless they have been faced with a valid raise. From what I've been told by various people (TDs, et al), a valid raise is 50% or more of a current mininum raise.

That's the way I've always played it.
Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.

User avatar
BigPete33
Moderator
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:08 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: FarmAnimal
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby BigPete33 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:50 pm

I think that was my point, I reckon you're getting the 50% from a different rule.
Pardon me, but I think you'll find that's a shovel. See you next Tuesday!

User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 8964
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:10 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Locker101
Location: The Scumm Bar
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby David » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:52 pm

Nope. From this rule.
Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby rcon » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:53 pm

bennymacca wrote:betting is not reopened if someone doesn't make a legal raise,
Agreed - unless of course you haven't acted yet, then you're free to do what ever you'd like!
bennymacca wrote:but are disagreeing on what a legal raise is.
Legal raise is last bet, minus bet before it (SB does not count as a bet.)

This is how it works online (well, its been my interpretation anyway :D )
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Trickier Rule Clarifications

Postby bennymacca » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:56 pm

lets say the blinds are 3000/6000

if someone throws 2x5000 chips into the pot without declaring their action, then that is more than 50% of a min raise, and their raise must be taken to 12000, not a call. this is what pete is talking about, and this is a different rule.

if this player is all in however for 10000, this doesn't constitute a legal raise, and betting is closed for all previous players to act.

so my understanding is that a legal raise is in fact 1BB, but if you put more than 50% of a raise in the pot without declaration, then your bet must be taken up to the legal raise.

two separate rules here.

i would really love to get a proper ruling on this. garth?
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter


Return to “General Poker Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest