MattyMoo wrote: 888 supply this great tool for us to use and I can just see a conflict of interest.
just so you know, 888 dont own/operate the forum, dave and scott and the mods do it off their own backs
MattyMoo wrote: 888 supply this great tool for us to use and I can just see a conflict of interest.
MattyMoo wrote:Furthermore, if 888 had a problem with this thread, they would've already said.
You're also assuming that everyone that will be attending mine was always going to go the Kingsford/other 888 events.
We're going to have like 30 players, max. Not really an issue dude.
That's cool AK. I'm just putting it out there. 888 supply this great tool for us to use and I can just see a conflict of interest. That's all I'm saying. There is potential for it to snowball with others choosing to use this as a precedent to discuss / promote their home games or any other game in fact which aren't in the interest for 888.
Either way, I think it's a great idea. I was thinking about doing the same for NYE but never got around to it.
I quite like Garth's idea.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
bennymacca wrote:Garth Kay wrote:Winrate award?
Min 5 hour block to be completed and the player with the greatest amount of $/hour takes the award.
i think the problem with this is that it gives incentives for people to quit the game.
if i have crushed over the first 5 hours, there is a fair chance i would stop playing and hope that my win rate was enough to get me the prize. this is why i like the overall, because it encourages the winning players to stay longer, just in case someone else goes on a heater.

old man Swanky wrote:I've seen you play mate, you have no chance of making the final table let alone crush it

bennymacca wrote: the idea would be that most people would try to go for 24hr, with a few coming and going.
so if it means that you start with 2-3 tables worth of people, but at 4am there are only 5 players left, then so be it.
you say you want to stagger entrants, but this wont really solve the above problem - noone is going to START playing at 4am.
so i think the answer is to have enough players start the game - ideally at least 20, that there will still be some around in the wee hours.
then hopefully the game might fill back up later as more people come
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
Return to “General Poker Chat”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests