He's saying his range for all in there is not AJ+
At a guess, I would say AK, JJ+
Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
-
MitchyMitch
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:49 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: Mitchymitch
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
AceLosesKing wrote:He's saying his range for all in there is not AJ+
At a guess, I would say AK, JJ+
Ok if your range there is AK, JJ+ what do you think my range is there?
888pl Online champs Main Event 2009 Winner
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
MitchyMitch wrote:AceLosesKing wrote:He's saying his range for all in there is not AJ+
At a guess, I would say AK, JJ+
Ok if your range there is AK, JJ+ what do you think my range is there?
For opening or calling?
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
-
MitchyMitch
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:49 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: Mitchymitch
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
AceLosesKing wrote:MitchyMitch wrote:AceLosesKing wrote:He's saying his range for all in there is not AJ+
At a guess, I would say AK, JJ+
Ok if your range there is AK, JJ+ what do you think my range is there?
For opening or calling?
For opening, what i call is, is irelevent at the time
888pl Online champs Main Event 2009 Winner
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
Ok so I don't know what Jmacks stack was at the time, but if we know that you have 20bb, from any position you're opening: 22-AA, AT-AK, KT-KQ.
Assume suited and offsuit. With action pending decisions will change obviously, but I think you'd be opening the above, if not wider.
Assume suited and offsuit. With action pending decisions will change obviously, but I think you'd be opening the above, if not wider.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
MitchyMitch wrote:whats up with that??
Hi Mitch,
I meant that if someone opens for 3 x BB in early pos, I would not shove with AJ, prob only with high pockets. Especially since my allin risked half my stack against you calling.....
Aaron, I had about 250k, he had about 120k......
Last edited by JMACK007 on Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
why not jmack?
i would like to know your reasoning for just jamming there
i am not saying you were wrong to do it, but i am just asking.
i would like to know your reasoning for just jamming there
i am not saying you were wrong to do it, but i am just asking.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- JMACK007
- Posts: 1656
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 4:22 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: JMACK007
- Contact:
Re: Mitchy Mitch to the Aussie Millions!
Actually benny the cunt it was mostly because my big pockets were getting smashed all tourney! I was more than happy to take what was already on the table with QQ....
I didn't put Mitch on a better pair, so if he called, I was most likely in front (as I was), so happy either way. Not overly happy with the suckout though, but you get used to that!
I didn't put Mitch on a better pair, so if he called, I was most likely in front (as I was), so happy either way. Not overly happy with the suckout though, but you get used to that!
What?, poker without the river??, you've just made my dreams come true!!!
Return to “General Poker Chat”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
