Postby BigPete33 » Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:50 pm
Your original poor argument was that a club HAD to spend big to have a shot at the title, which is just utter rubbish.
You have now disputed what I just told you in response to your post mentioning 'top 4 traditional title challengers' - again this is rubbish.
Some proof for you.....
Between 1992 (When the EPL formed) and 2004.
Chelsea:
11,14,11,11,6,4,3,5,6,6,4,2 = top 4 FOUR times in 12 seasons prior to 04/05.
So benny the cunt, you telling me I talk rubbish after I mention Chelsea weren't consistent top 4 performers is really just plain rude and demonstrates your complete ignorance.
Liverpool:
6,8,4,3,4,3,7,4,3,2,5,4 = top 4 EIGHT times in 12 seasons prior to 04/05.
Consistent top 4 is a yes. Title challengers is a big fat NO (except for one time when we came close to Arsenal). Quite often several points behind the eventual winner.
That's debunked 2 of the supposed top 4 regular title challengers and so far completely backs up what I told you. Now for the two teams that I mentioned WERE regular title challengers in that period.
Manchester United:
1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,3,1,3 = top 4 EVERY season and consistent title challengers.
Arsenal:
10,4,12,5,3,1,2,2,2,1,2,1 = top 4 NINE times in 12 seasons and for the large part, consistent title challengers.
Now that's two of the supposed 'top 4 traditional title challengers' actually challenging - and two of them NOT challenging.
Which is exactly what I said to you.
Pardon me, but I think you'll find that's a shovel. See you next Tuesday!