bennymacca wrote:rcon, sporting clubs are there to generate a profit, yes, but there are often much bigger reasons for helping out clubs financially. one of the main reasons is the effect that spending money at the top level has on the grass roots sport
since the inception of the a-league and the recent world cup, soccer has boomed in australia. it is definitely in the state governments interests that this does not become a flash in the pan
increased participation in sport is always a good thing for society, especially with the "obesity epidemic"
I hear what you are saying, I just don't agree with it. I'd much rather they took less of my money in the first place, and allowed me to spending it supporting clubs of my choosing. Governments picking winners doesn't really have a history of getting much right.
bennymacca wrote:kevin 747 is my facebook friend. me and him go way back

Yeah, I voted for him too, but I won't be voting labor again (which leaves me in a pickle, 'cause I don't think I could vote lib either), not after that recent pokies and plasma package

THAT IS MY MONEY!

Oh, and the FHOG increase that was designed to prop up housing prices - what happened to the talk of making housing more affordable?
GRRR!
BigPete33 wrote:Mafau is banned from any political discussion
Can't imaging why? lol.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."