$4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
User avatar
trishan
Posts: 4515
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: nplking
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby trishan » Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:51 pm

Spoiler:
I thought the overbet smelt of weakness like an AQ or AK or maybe a smaller pocket pair like 66,77 that does not want to see a difficult turn card. I jam and he calls with KK.
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here

User avatar
Caleb
Posts: 2568
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: manwithaduck
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby Caleb » Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:55 pm

bennymacca wrote:
Garth Kay wrote:B.) ESPECIALLY 4 bet if the punk min 3 bets FFS!


the "GFTO as if you min 3bet me i 4bet" is a strong part of the bennymacca kit bag.

also a good way to get me to spew off my chips :D


So noted.
Caleb Rybalka
SA Special Events Coordinator

"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:02 pm

Caleb Rybalka wrote:So noted.


pfft everyone knows this already, i use it to metagame fools who think i just jam it in with air.

best thing i ever did on 888 was become bennyjams.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby Garth Kay » Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:09 pm

bennymacca wrote:best thing i ever did on 888 was DEPOSIT.


FYP
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby bennymacca » Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:12 pm

888 is so soft its not funny. even in the cash games.

on the weekend i ran super bad and tilty and still broke even :D

might start grinding 20NL.

there i go, back to cash games again. why do i do this to myself. 3 minutes ago i said i was going to grind 90 mans LOL
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby maccatak11 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:31 pm

Maybe Garth can answer this, or perhaps this is also one for 2+2 (post a link benny the cunt if you have seen this before).

But, in the early stages of somebody making the transition from casual semi-serious player to consistently profitable player (this could probably describe most here on the forum), is it recommended to just stick to a certain type of game> (i.e. 6 max cashy's, or just MTT), or to play lots of different types, hoping to develop more rounded skills which can be drawn upon later.

I go through the same cycles as benny the cunt.

a) play lots of tournaments and do ok
b) realise it takes lots of time to win anything decent playing cheeseburger stakes tourneys, or have a long run without cashing
c) go and play some 6-max cashy's
d) do ok at 6-max cashy's, believe you are god
e) do bad at 6-max cashy's, tilt away a few buy ins
f) go back to playing lots of tournaments and do ok
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby AceLosesKing » Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:39 pm

We need a new strategy IMO.

a/ play poker.
b/ ????
c/ PROFIT!
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby Garth Kay » Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:59 pm

maccatak11 wrote:Maybe Garth can answer this, or perhaps this is also one for 2+2 (post a link benny the cunt if you have seen this before).

But, in the early stages of somebody making the transition from casual semi-serious player to consistently profitable player (this could probably describe most here on the forum), is it recommended to just stick to a certain type of game> (i.e. 6 max cashy's, or just MTT), or to play lots of different types, hoping to develop more rounded skills which can be drawn upon later.

I go through the same cycles as benny the cunt.

a) play lots of tournaments and do ok
b) realise it takes lots of time to win anything decent playing cheeseburger stakes tourneys, or have a long run without cashing
c) go and play some 6-max cashy's
d) do ok at 6-max cashy's, believe you are god
e) do bad at 6-max cashy's, tilt away a few buy ins
f) go back to playing lots of tournaments and do ok



Quite simply I just don't believe you can develop as a PROFITABLE player by mixing your disciplines, especially every time you hit a bad batch.

I would have to say that you need to stick to one discipline and focus on the core skills required to excel in that area and also to grow your knowledge base.

You both can readily admit that in terms of core skills, knowledge and temperament each discipline of MTT's, SNG's and ring require different capabilities.

When you train in any sport you require your body to retain "muscle memory" I feel the same way about poker you need to retain inate POKER MEMORY to be able to grown and become profeceint in poker. The situations you find yourself in and the basic decisions need to become instinctual for development.

I don't think you are giving yourself time to develop these instincts if you are changing from one format to another. And TBH the average human will retain only 30% of any new information assimilated in a day; so you truly do forget more than you learn about poker in one day.

I honestly believe that if you commit yourself to becoming the best in one form of the poker discipline then you will be able to branch out and use you supreme skills and knowledge as a very stable foundation for your move into another are of poker which may seem to become even more profitable.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
maccatak11
Posts: 4447
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maccatak11
Location: At the tables
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby maccatak11 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:17 pm

Thanks garth.

I know i play better at tourneys than cash games (where i am break even at best online), i guess its just a matter of trying to find the time to put in some serious volume.

I may be interested in your tournament challenge in a few weeks when i come back from the snow and the GF goes back to uni during the week.
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.

User avatar
gmatical
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: gmatical
Contact:

Re: $4.40 180-man SnG - Queens facing overbet on low flop

Postby gmatical » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:39 pm

trishan wrote:
Spoiler:
I thought the overbet smelt of weakness like an AQ or AK or maybe a smaller pocket pair like 66,77 that does not want to see a difficult turn card. I jam and he calls with KK.


I think you have to think of the consequences of your actions. In this situation (stacks & blinds)- i assume you were puzzled with his bet - try and make 'fold' your default play. If you 'guess' wrong - it's curtains.

I think if your short stacked, you could be forgiven here (can be the right play) - tilting is no excuse however.

Also, if you are hesitant to 4bet, try and decide what you are gonna do on a safe flop and commit to it.

I think you should have bet on that flop - and i am sure in hindsight you agree (probably would have cost you a little not alot to work out you were beat - unless he check called you to your death that is :) ).

Why DID you check that flop? Slowplaying gone pear shaped?
May all your pain be champagne!


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest