QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
User avatar
trishan
Posts: 4515
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: nplking
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby trishan » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:00 pm

Tournament #27614771 $5 + $0.50 - Table #5 (Real Money)
Seat 1: nplking ( $6,975 )
Seat 2: rugbyst31 ( $965 )
Seat 3: mrg153 ( $4,902 )
Seat 4: DUMASF ( $3,478 )
Seat 5: rogues11 ( $5,810 )
Seat 6: ieuanb ( $3,812 )
Seat 7: roniblk ( $3,000 )
Seat 10: rayzersharp ( $2,989 )
rogues11 posts small blind [$50]
ieuanb posts big blind [$100]
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to nplking [Qh] [Qd]
roniblk calls [$100]
rayzersharp calls [$100]
nplking raises [$300]
rugbyst31 folds
mrg153 folds
DUMASF folds
rogues11 raises [$750]
ieuanb folds
roniblk calls [$700]
rayzersharp folds
nplking calls [$500]
** Dealing flop ** [7c] [9s] [6c]
rogues11 bets [$5,010] 40/8/5.3 (67)
roniblk calls [$2,200] 46/6/20 (17)
nplking ??

Shortly before first break and I have this hand. They are playing so loose I figure I am ahead a lot of the time but it just smells like at least one of em has AA/KK. I am 8th overall at this stage, best to let it go or do you call?
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here

John Miller
Posts: 387
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:23 am
State: QLD
888PL Name: 8rok3n
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby John Miller » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:48 pm

A hell load of hand ranges there ..if they are 'loose' like you said could be 88 in 1 hand and AK clubs in the other, or 99, 66, 77, if they are very loose like VPIP over 45 I would call, if they are under 25 its a fold... its all dependent on the play up too that hand.
Man who runs in front of car gets tired,
man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

User avatar
trishan
Posts: 4515
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:04 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: nplking
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby trishan » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:52 pm

Codger wrote:A hell load of hand ranges there ..if they are 'loose' like you said could be 88 in 1 hand and AK clubs in the other, or 99, 66, 77, if they are very loose like VPIP over 45 I would call, if they are under 25 its a fold... its all dependent on the play up too that hand.


Btw there stats are:

rogues11 40/8/5.3 (67)
roniblk 46/6/20 (17)
FoldPre Forums - Old 888PL Forumers register here

John Miller
Posts: 387
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:23 am
State: QLD
888PL Name: 8rok3n
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby John Miller » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:07 pm

Well in that case I would call... you still might be beat by 1 of them ...even LAG's get cards, but its +EV to call, long term you would be in front calling against those stats.
Man who runs in front of car gets tired,
man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:10 pm

Pokerstove knows all!

I don't think you are beating much out there at the moment for this action.

Beware the min 3 bet.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby rcon » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:11 pm

I'd hardly call that a "low" board - someone has smacked that flop hard.

At BEST you're up against a TPTK hand or a pair with the straight draw. At a stretch you're up against a naked flush draw.

I can't think of an easier spot to fold QQ
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:15 pm

I do get sick of seeing the "min bet for value pre with my AA", "uh oh scary board better jam here and turn my hand into a bluff" type scenarios.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby rcon » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:15 pm

Garth Kay wrote:Pokerstove knows all!
Not really needed in this situation unless you put them on a hand like [Ac 9c] (where roomie?)
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

Larx36
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:18 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: 888LARX36
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Larx36 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:18 pm

Garth Kay wrote:I do get sick of seeing the "min bet for value pre with my AA", "uh oh scary board better jam here and turn my hand into a bluff" type scenarios.

This seems to be happening quite frequently of late. Have the 'big boys' been doing this on TV or something?
Poker: The game you can play perfectly and still be beaten

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: QQ - Facing 2 All-ins on low board - 2 Pots

Postby Garth Kay » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:31 pm

rcon wrote:
Garth Kay wrote:Pokerstove knows all!
Not really needed in this situation unless you put them on a hand like [Ac 9c] (where roomie?)



Are you sure? If those stats come from a sample of 6700 hands instead of 67, poker stove is most definitely required. Pick your hand ranges below.
Getting almost 2 to 1 on our money? But depending on stage of the tournament our tournament equity (ICM) increases dramatically with a double up in this spot (I presume this because 6K = 8th, 16K would almost be 1st.)


Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

6,557,586 games 0.109 secs 60,161,339 games/sec

Board: 7c 9s 6c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 35.705% 34.41% 01.29% 2256750 84627.67 { QdQh }
Hand 1: 33.440% 31.95% 01.49% 2095225 97621.67 { 99+, AKs, AcQc, AhQh, AsQs, AcJc, AsJs, KcQc, AKo }
Hand 2: 30.855% 29.84% 01.02% 1956559 66802.67 { 55+, AcKc, AcQc, AcJc, AcTc, Ac9c, Ac8c, Ac7c, Ac6c, Ac5c, Ac4c, Ac3c, Ac2c, KcQc, KcJc, KcTc, Kc9c, Kc8c, Kc7c, Kc6c, Kc5c, QcJc, QcTc, Qc9c, Qc8c, Qc7c, JcTc, Jc9c, Jc8c, Tc9c, Tc8c, Tc7c, 9c8c, 9c7c, 8c7c, 8c6c, 7c6c, 7c5c, 6c5c, 5c4c, 5c3c, 4c3c, 3c2c, A7o+, KTo, QTo, JTo }


---
7,598,745 games 0.141 secs 53,891,808 games/sec

Board: 7c 9s 6c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 34.824% 33.59% 01.24% 2552174 94023.67 { QdQh }
Hand 1: 32.646% 31.23% 01.42% 2373007 107645.67 { 99+, AKs, AcQc, AhQh, AsQs, AcJc, AsJs, KcQc, AKo }
Hand 2: 32.530% 31.58% 00.95% 2399732 72162.67 { 55+, AcKc, AcQc, AcJc, AcTc, Ac9c, Ac8c, Ac7c, Ac6c, Ac5c, Ac4c, Ac3c, Ac2c, KcQc, KcJc, KcTc, Kc9c, Kc8c, Kc7c, Kc6c, Kc5c, Kc4c, Kc3c, Kc2c, QcJc, QcTc, Qc9c, Qc8c, Qc7c, Qc6c, Qc5c, Qc4c, Qc3c, Qc2c, JcTc, Jc9c, Jc8c, Jc7c, Jc6c, Jc5c, Jc4c, Jc3c, Jc2c, Tc9c, Tc8c, Tc7c, Tc6c, Tc5c, Tc4c, Tc3c, Tc2c, 9c8c, 9c7c, 9c6c, 9c5c, 9c4c, 9c3c, 9c2c, 8c7c, 8c6c, 8c5c, 8c4c, 8c3c, 8c2c, 7c6c, 7c5c, 7c4c, 7c3c, 7c2c, 6c5c, 6c4c, 6c3c, 6c2c, 5c4c, 5c3c, 5c2c, 4c3c, 4c2c, 3c2c, A7o+, KTo, QTo, JTo }


---

10,859,478 games 0.203 secs 53,494,965 games/sec

Board: 7c 9s 6c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.723% 37.43% 01.29% 4064928 140174.33
{ QdQh }
Hand 1: 35.761% 34.30% 01.46% 3724320 159084.83
{ 99+, AKs, AcQc, AhQh, AsQs, AcJc, AsJs, KcQc, AKo }
Hand 2: 25.517% 24.60% 00.92% 2671507 99463.83
{ 55+, A2s+, K5s+, Q7s+, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, A7o+, K9o+, Q9o+, J9o+ }


---

11,521,377 games 0.531 secs 21,697,508 games/sec

Board: 7c 9s 6c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.812% 38.56% 01.25% 4442773 144092.33
{ QdQh }

Hand 1: 34.354% 32.93% 01.42% 3794231 163765.33
{ 99+, AJs+, KQs, AKo }

Hand 2: 25.835% 24.92% 00.91% 2871660 104855.33
{ 55+, A2s+, K5s+, Q7s+, J8s+, T8s+, 98s, A7o+, K9o+, Q9o+, J9o+ }
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests