Excuse my crude format
Hand #1
Blinds $2.5k/$5k/500 ante
18 left from 207 players
Folded around to me.............
SB (Me) $65K Holding KK
BB $22K ??
BB has 20% of his stack in with the blind, is the shortest stack of the 18 left.
Should I shove hoping to get a sigh/call (with any 2) because of his stack size, or call hoping he catches some piece of the flop and stacks off.
What's YOUR standard play here and why?
Hand #2
Blinds $2.5k/$5k/500 ante
14 left from 207 players
UTG (??) Stack $16K Shoves ALL IN
Folded around to me.........
No SB
BB (Me) Stack $??K 7 h 3 d
I hate when I 'have to call' but understand there sometimes are situations where I must. How big does my stack need to be to call with such junk?
Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
- gmatical
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: gmatical
- Contact:
Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
May all your pain be champagne!
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
hand 1
i like shoving with any 2 here most of the time. and as such, i would shove KK as well. i basically never limp the sb when its blind vs blind, i either raise or fold.
so i would just go ahead and put him all in and hope he calls.
hand 2.
got a few thoughts, want to run a few stoves though, so i will get back to you on that later tonight
i like shoving with any 2 here most of the time. and as such, i would shove KK as well. i basically never limp the sb when its blind vs blind, i either raise or fold.
so i would just go ahead and put him all in and hope he calls.
hand 2.
got a few thoughts, want to run a few stoves though, so i will get back to you on that later tonight
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
sorry gmatical, what is the second hand?
K7?
K7?
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- maccatak11
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maccatak11
- Location: At the tables
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
the second hand is 7 3. his stack is unknown and the discussion is on how big it would need to be.
1st hand is an easy shove, but second hand is a good discussion i think. i might have a good think about it and post something when i get home from footy.
1st hand is an easy shove, but second hand is a good discussion i think. i might have a good think about it and post something when i get home from footy.
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.
- AceLosesKing
- Posts: 9557
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Aces2Kings
- Location: Updating my status.
- Contact:
Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
Hand 1: shove.
Hand 2: fold.
I'll go into detail later, not home ATM.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hand 2: fold.
I'll go into detail later, not home ATM.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.
Aaron Coleman.
- gmatical
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: gmatical
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
maccatak11 wrote:the second hand is 7 3. his stack is unknown and the discussion is on how big it would need to be.
Correct - off suit too!!
May all your pain be champagne!
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
sorry, but in the second hand, whose stack size is unknown? ours or UTG?
i see a 16k there but im not 100% on who it refers to
i see a 16k there but im not 100% on who it refers to
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- muzzington
- Moderator
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:31 pm
- State: SA
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
UTG's stack is 16k compared to the 5k big blind, but big blinds stack is unknown.
I think with there being no SB I'd probably fold unless I had a very comfortable chip stack.
I think with there being no SB I'd probably fold unless I had a very comfortable chip stack.
We've how about links I would like to know I walk the line scrunches line at how the client Lawrence etc. etc.
- gmatical
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:46 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: gmatical
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
muzzington wrote:UTG's stack is 16k compared to the 5k big blind, but big blinds stack is unknown.
I think with there being no SB I'd probably fold unless I had a very comfortable chip stack.
What is your figure that you consider it okay to call with?
I will reveal what I did and why after hearing y'all opinion on what you would be.
Mathmatics may produce a 'correct' figure - but this could vary from one person to another based on their style, how they feel etc. I wonder if we agree or share very different opinions.
May all your pain be champagne!
- maccatak11
- Posts: 4447
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:39 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maccatak11
- Location: At the tables
- Contact:
Re: Later Stages of Cake $4k guarantee (2 hands)
so in hand 2 we need 11k to call and win a pot of approx 27k (we dont know how many people are on the table, so not sure how many antes).
So we are getting almost 2.5 to 1 to call here, but we have no information on the all in player - are they a nit? are they shoving with ATC?).
Lets assume they are a standard TAG and have waited to shove the top 15% of hands.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 28.035% 27.68% 00.35% 92904409 1184014.00 { 7c3d }
Hand 1: 71.965% 71.61% 00.35% 240339147 1184014.00 { 77+, A7s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QJo }
So even here its a pretty marginal call.
Obviously as the all in players range widens it becomes more of a call.
BUT, i think what gmatical is asking, is although we have what amounts to be a mathematical call, should we always make it? What does our stack size need to be before we make the call?
So its a cash game call, but this could turn into a good discussion about tournament equity.
I could post a few good tables and graphs from "Kill everyone" about equilibrium plays, but im buggered if i can understand half of them. I might read it again.
Do we call if its for half our stack? All of our stack? only a certain percentage of our stack?
So we are getting almost 2.5 to 1 to call here, but we have no information on the all in player - are they a nit? are they shoving with ATC?).
Lets assume they are a standard TAG and have waited to shove the top 15% of hands.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 28.035% 27.68% 00.35% 92904409 1184014.00 { 7c3d }
Hand 1: 71.965% 71.61% 00.35% 240339147 1184014.00 { 77+, A7s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QJo }
So even here its a pretty marginal call.
Obviously as the all in players range widens it becomes more of a call.
BUT, i think what gmatical is asking, is although we have what amounts to be a mathematical call, should we always make it? What does our stack size need to be before we make the call?
So its a cash game call, but this could turn into a good discussion about tournament equity.
I could post a few good tables and graphs from "Kill everyone" about equilibrium plays, but im buggered if i can understand half of them. I might read it again.
Do we call if its for half our stack? All of our stack? only a certain percentage of our stack?
Riskers gamble, experts calculate.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

