GF Busto hand

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
Conspiracy Theorist
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:42 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: CTheorist
Contact:

GF Busto hand

Postby Conspiracy Theorist » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:31 pm

Blinds 500/1000 antes 100??( or there abouts)

Folds to me in UTG+4

Me look down at [8h][8s] raise to 3500

Folds to SB and BB who both call

Flop [5h][6h][7s]

SB + BB check

I bet out 12500

SB+BB call

Turn [2d]

SB+BB check

I shove for 35000

and now wait for it....... SB+BB call? WTF SB is all in BB gets about 9000 back

SB hand [Kh][10h] BB hand [Ah][Qh]

River [Ad]

And im busto. FML

CT

User avatar
Swanky
Team Mistress Poker
Team Mistress Poker
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:50 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Swanky126
Location: Kona, Hawaii
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby Swanky » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:59 pm

That was Saturday right?
Having trouble letting go mate??:)
:D
Team Mistress Poker - Vic Champions!

Image
Image

User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby AceLosesKing » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:06 pm

So this is just a "poor me" hand? Cos strat seems fine, like the turn shove.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

User avatar
Scotty
Site Admin
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: IpumpFishies
Location: The 37th state
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby Scotty » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:07 pm

I'm surprised BB didn't check raise the flop TBH

Conspiracy Theorist
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:42 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: CTheorist
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby Conspiracy Theorist » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:26 pm

Dayrl is it? or Dante? No problem letting go, just got around to posting it is all.

And yes Aaron it is a bit of that.

If he check raised flop I still dont think I could have got away from it.

CT

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby rcon » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:46 pm

Conspiracy Theorist wrote:If he check raised flop I still dont think I could have got away from it.

CT
really? flopped straight possible, and I would hardly have been surprised to run into a set there either.

I'm with Scott tho, BB should have been c/r there, that is what you use a big stack and a wet board for - where you're drawing to the nuts.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."

User avatar
AceLosesKing
Posts: 9557
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Aces2Kings
Location: Updating my status.
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby AceLosesKing » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:50 pm

Yeah, being c/r in that spot is eww.
Scott wrote:Seriously, how hard is it to get his name right.

Aaron Coleman.

Conspiracy Theorist
Posts: 558
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:42 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: CTheorist
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby Conspiracy Theorist » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:02 pm

Flopped straight was possible, but unlikely in my mind.

Flopped set did occur to me but again seemed unlikely given the turn check.

Are you saying the turn shove was a bad play rcon?

CT

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby bennymacca » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:18 pm

you played it fine, just got unlucky.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
rcon
Moderator
Posts: 4493
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: maffau
Location: Over boats
Contact:

Re: GF Busto hand

Postby rcon » Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:37 pm

That wasn't the point of my earlier post, which was directed at your indication you wouldn't be willing to lay down an over pair (of 8s) on a 657hh board. I think that is too loose.

But on the turn, you're betting 35k in to 3500+3500+3500+900+11500x3=45900 knowing the other two hands have to be drawing to something, so if one calls, they're both calling. At which point, you're in terrible shape :-(

If you were playing this hand against 1 opponent, I can see the rational, but I don't think you're good often enough to warrant the push on the turn, particularly 9 handed.

edit: As Ben says, there is nothing wrong with what you did, I'm just not sure I'd play it that way myself.
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest