Set of 4's on the turn

Discuss the way you played - or misplayed - hands in here.
User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:47 pm

And get sidetracked at work and look like a douche because I posted after results are clear.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:49 pm

Also guys, micro level tournaments might mean loose, weak play post flop and on the flop, but all ins post flop (and even more so on the turn) generally mean strength and most times the nuts or nut draws.

Also it depends on hand strength perception from villains (so if villain thinks AA is unbeatable they will move all in here with AA) whilst a thinking player will laydown AA on the turn.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
Bacon
Posts: 6059
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:26 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: Bacon8100
Location: Beyond the fence
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Bacon » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:49 pm

pundies wrote:
bennymacca wrote: i dont like limping any pocket pairs


Sometimes I like a limp with a low pocket pair, it can be a good way to get paid.

Unfortunatly this situation did not work out that way, but I would have played it the same way for a $2.20 buy.........for the chance.

Had the buy in been $200..........that changes things. I would have folded pre in that position.


For a $200 buy-in, I'm raising in that position. Heck, for a $2.20, I might too. But nothing wrong with flatting occasionally to set mine. Depends on the lay of the table. Seeing how passive it seems from that flop, I would have raised.

As played, I'm calling. $1030 to win $4755 in the end, with 10 outs, most likely 8 (given I have someone on 2 pair).
I'm not perfect. I'm what perfect aspires to become

User avatar
Scotty
Site Admin
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: IpumpFishies
Location: The 37th state
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Scotty » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:52 pm

Garth Kay wrote:
trishan wrote:
MattyMoo wrote:Trishan do you call the two all ins?


At these stakes Matty I can't hit call fast enough.



Are you sure - drawing straightening board and I am pretty sure one of the all ins has the str8 already.

I'm not sure if stacking off here is the right play, too many hands have you beat and too many other hands have you stacking off pretty light on the redraw.


I agree with your first sentiment Garth, with respect to the straight, but I wouldn't say three hands beating us at this point qualifies as 'too many'?

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:56 pm

Scott wrote:I agree with your first sentiment Garth, with respect to the straight, but I wouldn't say three hands beating us at this point qualifies as 'too many'?


Sorry it should say too many opportunites or hand combinations have you beat now and on the river. Most of these allins either have the nuts or are drawing to them.

I think there is also a lot more possibility here of villains waking up with 88 and 77 considering it is a limped pot, no play here is screaming out overpairs. Rather it's bigger sets, str8s, top two pairs and nut draws.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:06 pm

Just stoved it.

If we are up against -
P3 -all 56 combos
p2 -ALL diamond flush draws
HERO - 44

We have 22% equity (Str8 has 56%)

If we are up against:

P1 - 44
P2 - ALL DIAMOND FLUSH DRAW COMBOS
P3 - All 56 combos
P4 - All 87 combos

Our equity drops to 9% (with the flush draw @19%, Str8 @ 61%, and two pair @ 10%) Set has lowest equity at 9.8%

So against three all ins we have equity, against 4 all ins we have none. NOTE: we are assigning a fairly tight ranges to villains here, some players will call off with Q8, K8 and A8 combos as well.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
pundies
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:52 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: pundies
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby pundies » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:24 pm

Bacon wrote:
For a $200 buy-in, I'm raising in that position



To me the hand is weak. If I am called I am most likely out of position and unless I hit a set on the flop, potentially way behind.

At that early stage of a tournament, in that position, 44 is unlikely to be in my playable range. But you never know :)
Note to self: Fold Aces on the bubble.......

User avatar
Garth Kay
Posts: 7526
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby Garth Kay » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:48 pm

pundies wrote:
Bacon wrote:
For a $200 buy-in, I'm raising in that position


At that early stage of a tournament, in that position, 44 is unlikely to be in my playable range. But you never know :)


Hence why you raise with it for the implied odds and the possible reverse implied odds.
Garth Kay

General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group


Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au

User avatar
pundies
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:52 pm
State: VIC
888PL Name: pundies
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby pundies » Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:58 pm

Garth Kay wrote:Hence why you raise with it for the implied odds and the possible reverse implied odds.


I see the maths.

But I am more times that not folding in that position, early in a tournament.

Its a marathon, not a sprint. I will wait for a much better spot to reach for my chips.

In saying that Garth, I have set myself a task to become more educated on the maths side of poker, so perhaps I will do some 'odd' reading over the weekend.
Note to self: Fold Aces on the bubble.......

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Set of 4's on the turn

Postby bennymacca » Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:01 pm

pundies wrote:In saying that Garth, I have set myself a task to become more educated on the maths side of poker, so perhaps I will do some 'odd' reading over the weekend.


maybe there is a quiz for you to do afterwards :D

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=5387
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter


Return to “Hand Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests