Caleb Rybalka wrote:Bacon wrote:I can't see how I would fold the nuts flush, even with the possibility of the house.
Would you like to play some omaha?
Can't be any worse than I am at NLHE
Caleb Rybalka wrote:Bacon wrote:I can't see how I would fold the nuts flush, even with the possibility of the house.
Would you like to play some omaha?
Bacon wrote:I can't see how I would fold the nuts flush, even with the possibility of the house.
Bacon wrote:Can't be any worse than I am at NLHE
Scott wrote:Whilst I fold here most of the time, this IS the base line type of scenario in which I would stack off in PLO.
Snapple wrote:A pot bet on the flop generally screams a set (in most scenarios).
David wrote:"horrible and lovely card at the same time"
= horrible.
Snapple wrote:But I also wouldn't be calling the flop with just the nut flush, In omaha I generally want more than just a flush draw to be calling.
the reason i did was because we were so deep. if he has the second nut flush draw, which is distinctly possible (he can have all sorts of combo draws, or 2 pair plus flush draws etc), then it is going to be a massive payday for me.
Depends on the stakes/players. Lower stakes will lead out pot with nut/2nd nut FD and a piece, you agree? So, for example, a hand like AxKh10xXh?
Snapple wrote:Calling any flush on a paired board in omaha is just asking for trouble
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests