Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
- rcon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:01 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: maffau
- Location: Over boats
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
think I'll have a 
"Please, my Leftie friends. On no possible definition does cutting someone’s tax rate constitutute ‘giving’ them money."
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
ok, ill give my answer now
a few have already touched on it, but imho it is completely ridiculous to even contemplate playing phil ivey, and here is why
your edge playing blackjack is - 0.5%. what do you think it would be against phil ivey. do you really think you are anything close to a coinflip against him?
this alone makes it extremely clear that blackjack is the better game to play, although both are obviously losing plays in the long term.
i decided to put a couple of extra things in there about choosing the stakes etc, just to get people to think about the variance of each of the games.
caleb correctly deduced that lowering the stakes in blackjack is good, because it lowers our variance. by playing $1 a hand until the last hour or couple of hours means that we are reducing the time the house has to win a significant amount of money from us.
against ivey, his skill edge would be so large that he would crush us in such a short time its not funny.
but, because ivey has such a massive skill edge against us, i think it would be better for him to keep the stakes small. the deeper the stacks, the bigger his skill advantage becomes, and the lower the overall variance.
a few have already touched on it, but imho it is completely ridiculous to even contemplate playing phil ivey, and here is why
your edge playing blackjack is - 0.5%. what do you think it would be against phil ivey. do you really think you are anything close to a coinflip against him?
this alone makes it extremely clear that blackjack is the better game to play, although both are obviously losing plays in the long term.
i decided to put a couple of extra things in there about choosing the stakes etc, just to get people to think about the variance of each of the games.
caleb correctly deduced that lowering the stakes in blackjack is good, because it lowers our variance. by playing $1 a hand until the last hour or couple of hours means that we are reducing the time the house has to win a significant amount of money from us.
against ivey, his skill edge would be so large that he would crush us in such a short time its not funny.
but, because ivey has such a massive skill edge against us, i think it would be better for him to keep the stakes small. the deeper the stacks, the bigger his skill advantage becomes, and the lower the overall variance.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
rcon wrote:think I'll have a
the whole point about counting was i didn't want people to argue that BJ was +EV.
i very nearly (and probably should have) chosen pokies as the game we had to play instead of ivey.
i still think it would be better to play pokies than ivey over a 24h period
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- Caleb
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: manwithaduck
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
bennymacca wrote:rcon wrote:think I'll have a
the whole point about counting was i didn't want people to argue that BJ was +EV.
i very nearly (and probably should have) chosen pokies as the game we had to play instead of ivey.
i still think it would be better to play pokies than ivey over a 24h period
Roulette would've been the best option.
Caleb Rybalka
SA Special Events Coordinator
"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne
SA Special Events Coordinator
"Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid." - John Wayne
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
that was my other option.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- gundog
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:29 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Murray Cod
- Location: 100yards from the 42nd Gum Tree on the left
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
I only have 1 option because BJ is a shiela's game, it's worse than Pontoon and I wouldn't play it either.
Can we play dealers choice?
Can we play dealers choice?
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
- bennymacca
- Moderator
- Posts: 16623
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: bennyjams
- Location: In your poker Nightmares
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
gundog wrote:I only have 1 option because BJ is a shiela's game, it's worse than Pontoon and I wouldn't play it either.
Can we play dealers choice?
if we took you as an example, then poker would be an idiots game
secondly, you really think dealers choice will matter when you play ivey?
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!
Follow Me on Twitter
- Garth Kay
- Posts: 7526
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: suckoutmgnet
- Location: Quite often in front of my laptop
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
gundog wrote:I only have 1 option because BJ is a shiela's game, it's worse than Pontoon and I wouldn't play it either.
Can we play dealers choice?
LMAO @ true ignorance.
You want to play Ivey in a game of HIS choosing?
Yeah way to go on that call! Considering he is the master of just about every non HE discipline as well.
Garth Kay
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
General Manager – Poker Operations
Full House Group
Mobile: 0438 234 816
Email: garth@fullhousegroup.com.au
- 666HARPS666
- Posts: 2309
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:43 pm
- State: VIC
- 888PL Name: 666HARPS666
- Location: out the back of the Star Hotel in Rutherglen
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
I would gladly play him in Chess 
POKERSTAR GALACTICA

as heard on The Rail.com.au
+ a Vic who came 5th on the S.A, leader board season 1,. 2011 with only 12 games there. lol.

as heard on The Rail.com.au
+ a Vic who came 5th on the S.A, leader board season 1,. 2011 with only 12 games there. lol.
- gundog
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:29 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Murray Cod
- Location: 100yards from the 42nd Gum Tree on the left
- Contact:
Re: Phil Ivey or Blackjack?
My dealers choice is Short Deck Jackpot Draw Poker
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Return to “Beginner Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

