Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Old threads that are still useful, but take up space!
User avatar
BigPete33
Moderator
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:08 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: FarmAnimal
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby BigPete33 » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:04 pm

We've teased benny the cunt plenty already so I figured I'd help a bloke out :)
Pardon me, but I think you'll find that's a shovel. See you next Tuesday!

Laura
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby Laura » Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:18 pm

BigPete33 wrote:Given that you said you were on the button - the person 2 places from you wasn't the BB was it? If yes, I'd have been instantly suspicious of the BB min raising. If not, a min raise in lateish position reeks of wanting a caller and I'd still have been instantly suspicious.

( Well, this is what I would have thought until the state final where the vast majority of any raise I saw all day in any position was only a min raise! We got Laura to stop doing that, only 19 odd thousand other players to go lol )



Yep, now I just need to convince people to respect my raises!

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby bennymacca » Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:39 am

pete, he was in mid position, number 2 i think - so i knew a min raise meant pocket pair or AK.

when he checked the flop, i threw out an 800 bet more for information - the fact that he flat called meant that i didnt put him on aces because i thought he would raise with them (same with KK actually, but i think he respected my bet :P)

from his body reaction, i knew he didnt like the ace (he pretty much physically cringed when it came out)

so i decided to bluff. i know KQ was behind, way behind, and i wasnt trying for a straight or anything, i wanted him to fold the hand.

i think that based on the information that i thought i had, i played the hand pretty much right. the only thing was that it was KK, and he couldnt bear to lay it down. if it was 1010 then i am certain that it would have been my pot - only a slight misread.

but oh well, live and learn.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby bennymacca » Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:56 am

lol i didnt stick around to the end at the spot monday night, and i just checked - Rob ended up winning the tourney!

at least my chips didnt go to waste, but it does make me think that that could have been me!!

oh well, well done rob


ill present the question in another way:

is there anything else that people would have done to make someone fold their KK to an ace on the board?

am i allowed to say to rob "if you can beat AJ, then play, otherwise fold?"

i wasnt sure if this was within etiquette/rules, so i didnt say anything, but i really wanted to, and if i did, i reckon he would have believed me and folded.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
muzzington
Moderator
Posts: 4628
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:31 pm
State: SA
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby muzzington » Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:39 am

If you checked the flop, he might have believed you had an ace if you bet a substantial amount on the turn, or raised him if he bet.

I can't remember what the NPL rules are on the players involved in a pot table talking, but I thought it was ok as long as you didn't say what your hand was exactly. Of course, a lot of people don't like table talk because you look like a wanker.
We've how about links I would like to know I walk the line scrunches line at how the client Lawrence etc. etc.

User avatar
BigPete33
Moderator
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:08 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: FarmAnimal
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby BigPete33 » Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:45 am

I love it how muzzington only speaks when it's funny :P

Table talk does indeed make you look like a wanker.

benny the cunt, 2 choices on that one from the extra info you gave me... represent the ace (big time) or fold. Given the cringe you could almost bank on him having KK or QQ.
Pardon me, but I think you'll find that's a shovel. See you next Tuesday!

User avatar
bennymacca
Moderator
Posts: 16623
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:30 am
State: SA
888PL Name: bennyjams
Location: In your poker Nightmares
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby bennymacca » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:14 am

yeah, in hindsight i probably should have check-folded, but if i won the pot, i would have nearly doubled up.

if my read said KK initially, i probably still would have put him all in to try to make him fold.

to represent an ace more effectively, a check on the flop would have been better, but initially, i wanted to see whether he pre-flop raised with AK or something, so thats why i bet. his call made me put him on pockets.

BigPete33 wrote:benny the cunt, 2 choices on that one from the extra info you gave me... represent the ace (big time) or fold. Given the cringe you could almost bank on him having KK or QQ.


you are right pete, and i just chose the wrong time - but he VERY nearly folded, so it almost worked.
Check out The Rail, the only podcast dedicated to Australian Pub Poker! http://www.therail.com.au.
Once you have done that, follow the Rail Podcast on Twitter, Facebook!, and iTunes!

Follow Me on Twitter

User avatar
Darren B
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby Darren B » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:49 am

Hey benny the cunt

Just a thought for the future.
I always allow SOME table talk as long as it is heads up.
Where I draw a firm line is when people not in the hand start offering their opinion.
As to you declaring that you have an ace or ace jack.....hmmmm borderline!!
I would have maybe gone another way. If I was asked if I had the ace or not my reply would have been........"well if you dont have it, just keep putting your chips in. I need to double up!"...and smile BIG!!

Cheers
Image

User avatar
Scotty
Site Admin
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
State: SA
888PL Name: IpumpFishies
Location: The 37th state
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby Scotty » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:55 am

I've got no issues with the last part you mentioned, Darren. It's ambiguous.

What is completely wrong IMO, is stating something yourself about the contents of your hand, ie "I have the ace", or "I've hit the flush/2 pair", etc etc. If it's up to me, that person is now compelled to muck their hand.

User avatar
Darren B
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Nathans Guide to Good Poker Pt. II

Postby Darren B » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:01 pm

Hard one to moderate, Scott!!
I do agree to an extent. But to be perfectly honest....if you are listening to the other guy in a heads up situation, you pretty much deserve what you get!
Image


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest