(Of course, Bundy should feel slightly aggrieved too
Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
- Scotty
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7971
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: IpumpFishies
- Location: The 37th state
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
Any yet, I do believe old man Swanky shipped the tournament, despite that ugly beat 
(Of course, Bundy should feel slightly aggrieved too
)
(Of course, Bundy should feel slightly aggrieved too
- muzzington
- Moderator
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:31 pm
- State: SA
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
Scot would have folded Queens.
We've how about links I would like to know I walk the line scrunches line at how the client Lawrence etc. etc.
- Origami
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:12 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: .AAABK.
- Location: NURIOOTPA in the BAROSSA VALLEY
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
muzzington wrote:Scot would have folded Queens.
Scott is a good player
..
..

..
- AJG
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:07 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: .pKoIkNeGr.
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
bennymocha wrote:it is (1/1326)^3 = about 1 in 2.3 billion. not bad going
(sorry AJG, you dont just multiply it by 3)
Yeah, mistake there, I did know ^3, dunno why I wrote x3???
But I still cant see how probability of KK or QQ is condtional on your Aces?
How does your holding Aces in any way effect the probability of someone else holding Ks or Qs?
Or have I misunderstood when you said "given that you have aces"?
if you asked "if i have aces, how likely is it that there are 2 other people that have QQ and KK"
isn't the probability exactly the same as if you had 72o?
David wrote:Shutup.
Is this really appropriate or acceptable from a site admin? cmon...
I really cant see why so many people took what I wrote as condescending.
I first ask the question "Did another player declare he folded a K", which she later confirmed,
then said "I only mention because....". There ARE people who have some confusion about outs.
@jacqianie: I hope you didnt take my post in any way other than how it was intended, as the first part was a question to you its really only your opinion in this that has any relevance. If you did, I apologise.
Thanks for the 'Chill out' post Caleb
-
Larx36
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:18 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: 888LARX36
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
bennymocha wrote:Larx36 wrote:I do remember that crazy hand Chris... so glad I was a spectator... But as we said after the hand... Standard!! lol
(good to meet you for a fleeting moment tonight as well dave. how did you go in the end?)
Likewise benny the cunt, Nah no good. Tried a shove with 7h7d on button and was called by BB with Ad10h..board of 4 hearts.
Oh well... next time.
Poker: The game you can play perfectly and still be beaten
-
Larx36
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:18 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: 888LARX36
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
Scott wrote:Any yet, I do believe old man Swanky shipped the tournament, despite that ugly beat
(Of course, Bundy should feel slightly aggrieved too)
Yeah indeed he did. I believe it was queens that set him back on track. QQ v AA hitting Q on flop and the quads on river from memory.
Poker: The game you can play perfectly and still be beaten
- David
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8964
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:10 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: Locker101
- Location: The Scumm Bar
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
AJG wrote:David wrote:Shutup.
It was actually meant for Caleb.
You must have posted just before I posted mine.
Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify me.
- AJG
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:07 am
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: .pKoIkNeGr.
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
OK sorry.... understood
- Scotty
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7971
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 pm
- State: SA
- 888PL Name: IpumpFishies
- Location: The 37th state
- Contact:
- muzzington
- Moderator
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:31 pm
- State: SA
- Contact:
Re: Crazy hand AA V KK V QQ
Origami wrote:muzzington wrote:Scot would have folded Queens.
Scott is a good player
Scot would have had a good reason.
We've how about links I would like to know I walk the line scrunches line at how the client Lawrence etc. etc.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

